Are firefighting roles for incarcerated individuals ethical?

Abstract:

Recruiting incarcerated individuals as firefighters to slow the spread of wildfires is a controversial practice. We argue that, provided certain important conditions are met, this practice can be made ethically permissible. While these conditions have not yet been satisfied, we contend that achievable and promptly operable reforms—short of more comprehensive reforms to the criminal-legal system—could fulfill them. In this paper, we address three main arguments against this contentious practice: (1) firefighting is too risky for incarcerated individuals; (2) incarcerated firefighters are both unduly induced into participation and exploited in their work; and (3) the future employment prospects for incarcerated firefighters are unsatisfactory. In response to these concerns, we propose actions including more comprehensive and frequent health screening, ensuring adequate safety training and equipment, and improving pathways to future firefighting employment. While the first two actions only reduce the chances of exploitation, we show how improving future firefighting employment can simultaneously reduce the chances of both exploitation and undue inducement.